| Författare |
Meddelande |
muldaaaa
Medlem
|
#31 Skrivet: 29 Jan 2008 11:12
1. e4 c5, 2. Pf3 d6, 3. d4 cxd4, 4. Dxd4?! is the best...
|
Lirare_7
Medlem
|
#32 Skrivet: 29 Jan 2008 12:00
Nej verkligen inte...
|
Mayo
Medlem
|
#33 Skrivet: 29 Jan 2008 15:42
Kinda funny, muldaaaa, that you attach a ?! to 4.Dxd4 and at the same time say that it's the best.
?! means "doubtful move" you know 
|
shieldfire
Medlem
|
#34 Skrivet: 29 Jan 2008 17:30 - Redigerad av: shieldfire
And just make some people here happy (or not) I doubt it's doubtful, thinking that that's a rather dubious  word in the current context.
|
Mayo
Medlem
|
#35 Skrivet: 29 Jan 2008 21:48
Dubious = doubtful, same but different, yeah?
|
knightrider
Medlem
|
#36 Skrivet: 29 Jan 2008 22:07
?! = doubtful move
(enligt International Chess Database, New in Chess och Informator)
|
shieldfire
Medlem
|
#37 Skrivet: 30 Jan 2008 05:41 - Redigerad av: shieldfire
Hrmpf, blushingly I must admit to being wrong (see that Vilhelm?). I'd rather use dubious though - doubtful sounds wrong in my ears. Don't know why. Might it be something american-brittish? (Grasping at straws here...).
Edit: Checked with my dictionary and I'd feel fine to keep to dubious. I feel that doubtful can be seen more as the outcome of the plan represented by the move, while dubious relates to the move itself. But they can be used synonumously.
|
Mayo
Medlem
|
#38 Skrivet: 30 Jan 2008 09:03
Ya, dubious sounds better now that you mention it. I think it is also used a lot more in chess books compared to doubtful, never mind what NIC or Informator might say.
So yes, grasshopper (), 4.D/Qxd4 might be dubious/doubtful even though I think a lot of people would consider it just as natural as 4.Nxd4.
|
muldaaaa
Medlem
|
#39 Skrivet: 30 Jan 2008 11:32
with 'is the best' I mean its a start of a great game, Im not meaning that its in theory the best move (which is Pxd4 ofcourse)
Like the ?! says, its doubtful.
|
motortrulpen
Medlem
|
#40 Skrivet: 30 Jan 2008 20:13
Citerar: shieldfire, #34: And just make some people here happy (or not) I doubt it's doubtful, thinking that that's a rather dubious word in the current context.
You people sure are a fun lot.  And I'm, paradoxically (or ironically) enough, contextually included. Well.. I can live with that. No hay problema. 
I think that 1. X! Y! 2. Z! x! 3. y! z! is a very exciting option indeed...
|
Mayo
Medlem
|
#41 Skrivet: 30 Jan 2008 21:07
I second that, Mr Trulp! (Now that sounds 'snofally similar to Mr Trump, doesn't it? )
|
motortrulpen
Medlem
|
#42 Skrivet: 30 Jan 2008 22:13
I'm no mister to nobody. I'm the trulp.
Mr Trump is for sure a poor bastard, not counting the dough.
|
krokofant
Medlem
|
#43 Skrivet: 30 Jan 2008 23:19
Hump the bump
Sure your mr Trump
|
motortrulpen
Medlem
|
#44 Skrivet: 30 Jan 2008 23:25
Här slant en elefant, eller kanske ofantlig pedant,
så sant, så sant
|
krokofant
Medlem
|
#45 Skrivet: 30 Jan 2008 23:43
eller en krokofant...
|
cheesexplorer
Medlem
|
#46 Skrivet: 31 Jan 2008 03:55
Citerar: muldaaaa, #31: Pf3
Citerar: muldaaaa, #39: Pxd4
Does P stand for Pony?
|
muldaaaa
Medlem
|
#47 Skrivet: 31 Jan 2008 09:07
loll.. sorry, international its Nf3, Nxd4 (Knight) in Dutch we give the Knight a P, for Paard, which means Horse in Dutch.
|
Mayo
Medlem
|
#48 Skrivet: 31 Jan 2008 09:34
What do you call king, queen, bishop etc in Dutch?
|
muldaaaa
Medlem
|
#49 Skrivet: 31 Jan 2008 09:37
King = Koning = K
Queen = Dame = D
Bishop = Loper = L
Knight = Paard = P
Rook = Toren = T
|
Mayo
Medlem
|
#50 Skrivet: 31 Jan 2008 10:24
Thanks! And pawn?
|
muldaaaa
Medlem
|
#51 Skrivet: 31 Jan 2008 13:31
pawn = pion
|
Malvan
Moderator
|
#52 Skrivet: 31 Jan 2008 15:25
And in Swedish:
King = Kung = K
Queen = Dam (Drottning) = D
Rook = Torn = T
Knight = Springare = S
Bishop = Löpare = L
pawn = bonde
More like Dutch than English. The word kung also has the longer form konung.
|
muldaaaa
Medlem
|
#53 Skrivet: 31 Jan 2008 15:34
well, they are both Germanian languages (not german, germanian).. So is English btw.
|
PdeK
Medlem
|
#54 Skrivet: 2 Feb 2008 00:21
Hej Muldaaa,
Talar du båda englisk och nederländskt ? Ock du spelar ständigt Dxd4 ?
Varifrån kommer du ?
|
Kater_Karlo
Medlem
|
#55 Skrivet: 2 Feb 2008 07:05
Hi Muldaaa,
German is a germanian languague, too By the way, the German notation is quite similar to the Swedish.
K = König, D = Dame, T = Turm, L = Läufer, S = Springer, B = Bauer (pawn)
We call the knight also "Pferd" what is similar to the Dutch "paard".
Bästa hälsningar från Tyskland
Karl
|
LastNight
Medlem
|
#56 Skrivet: 2 Feb 2008 14:15
e5
|
cobra3
Medlem
|
#57 Skrivet: 2 Feb 2008 20:36
I play against e5 always the Italian opening i love to have c5 against me and for the e6 players its for checkers there are two openings i dont like and that are e6 or c6.
I play now Scandinavian but i have also play Nf6 (few times) e5 and c5.
There are a lot openings against e5 for example.Italian-Scotsch-Russian-Spanisch King's gambit and there are many more.
|
Malvan
Moderator
|
#58 Skrivet: 2 Feb 2008 20:48 - Redigerad av: Malvan
The Scandinavian defence (1. e4 d5) is not very common, is it?
|
CAQUELAQ
Medlem
|
#59 Skrivet: 2 Feb 2008 21:11
The Scandinavian is not bad, if you play it correctly! Yes, White will have more space, but Black stands solid. You just wait for White to make a mistake, then you take the control, and run him over!
Very simple. really! 
|
Malvan
Moderator
|
#60 Skrivet: 2 Feb 2008 21:20
But if White knows the theory, he won't make a mistake...
|
